Developing reflection on competence-based learning: the Russian experience with the Tuning approach
The paper focuses on the Tuning Russia project. It aims at providing an overview of the impact of the Tuning methodology and outcomes concerning University teaching, learning, and assessment activities. It identifies: the most relevant results and “lesson learnt” during the project; tools/concepts/experiences that involved teachers found most interesting; strengths and weaknesses; the usefulness of working with colleagues from different Russian universities; and the level of sharing of the Tuning methodology with other colleagues within participating Universities. The empirical data for the study were drawn from a qualitative questionnaire with open questions filled-in by the members of the subject area group “Social Work” involved in the Tuning Russia project. The respondents were six academic teachers from different Russian universities and two European Tuning experts. This reflection by academic teachers upon the initial implementation of the Tuning approach in Russia highlights the opportunities to explore methods of establishing and improving communities of practice in the field of competence-based higher education curriculum development. Results highlight the need to develop further work concerning both summative and formative evaluation in relation to competence-based curricula review in higher education
Published online: 4 July 2014
Arter, Judith, and Jan Chappuis. Creating and recognizing quality rubrics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall, 2007.
Biggs, John. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Buckingham: Open University Press, 2003.
Buckley, Sheryl and Maria Jakovljevic, eds. Knowledge management innovations for interdisciplinary education: organizational applications. USA: IGI Global Publishers, 2012.
_____. and Paul Giannakopoulos. “Technology and tools supporting CoPs.” In Knowledge management innovations for interdisciplinary education: organizational applications, edited by Sheryl Buckley and Maria Jakovljevic. USA: IGI Global Publisher, 2012.
Burón Orejas, Javier. Enseñar a aprender. Introducción a la metacognitión. Bilbao: Mensajero, 1993.
Butler, Debora. L. and Philip Winne. “Feedback and self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis.” Review of Educational Research 65, 3 (1995): 245–281.
Commission of the European Communities. “A new partnership for the modernisation of universities: the EU Forum for University Business Dialogue.” COM(2009) 158 final. Brussels: European Commission, 2009.
Engeström, Yrjö. “Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization.” Journal of Education and Work 14, 1 (2001): 133-156.
González, Julia, and Robert Wagenaar. TUNING Educational Structures in Europe II. Universities’ contribution to the Bologna Process. Final report Project Phase Universidad de Deusto / Universiteit Groningen: Deusto University Press, 2005.
Gow, Lin, and David Kember. “Conceptions of teaching and their relationship to student learning.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 63 (1993): 20-33.
High Level Group on the Modernisation of Higher Education. “Report to the European Commission on Improving the quality of teaching and learning in Europe’s higher education institutions.” Brussels: European Commission, 2013.
Hoidn, Sabine, and Kiira Kärkkäinen. “Promoting Skills for Innovation in Higher Education: A Literature Review on the Effectiveness of Problem-based Learning and of Teaching Behaviours.” OECD Education Working Papers Nº 100. OECD Publishing, 2014.
Karavayeva, Yevgeniya V., and Yelena N. Kovtun. “Adapting the Tuning Programme Profiles to the Needs of Russian Higher Education”, Tuning Journal for Higher Education, Issue No. 1 (November 2013): 187-202.
Kember, David. “Teaching beliefs and their impact on students’ approach to learning.” In Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, edited by Barry Dart and Gillian Boulton-Lewis, 1-25. Camberwell, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research, 1998.
Lokhoff, Jenneke, Bas Wegewijs, Katja Durkin, Robert Wagenaar, Julia González, Ann Katherine Isaacs, Luigi F Donà dalle Rose, and Mary Gobbi. A Guide to Formulating Degree Programme Profiles. Bilbao, Groningen, and The Hague: Universidad de Deusto, 2010.
Nicol, David J., and Debra Macfarlane-Dick. “Formative assessment and self- regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice.” Studies in Higher Education 31, 2 (2006): 199-218.
Norton, Lin, J. T. E. Richardson, J. Hartley, S. Newstead, and J. Mayes. “Teachers’ beliefs and intentions concerning teaching in higher education.” Higher Education 50 (2005): 537-571.
Ramsden, Paul. Learning to teach in higher education. 2nd edition. London: Routledge, 2003.
Reddy, Y. Malini, and Heidi Andrade. “A review of rubric use in higher education.”Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35, 4 (2010): 435-448.
Samuelowicz, Katherine, and John D. Bain. “Revisiting academics beliefs about teaching and learning.” Higher Education 41(2001): 299-325.
Schön, Donald. The reflective practitioner. London: Temple Smith, 1983.
_____. “Teaching artistry through reflection-in-action.” In Educating the reflective practitioner, 22-40. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1987.
Scriven, Michael. “The methodology of evaluation.” In Perspectives on Curriculum Evaluation (AERA Monograph Series - Curriculum Evaluation), edited by Ralph W. Tyler, Robert M. Gagné, and Michael Scriven. Rand McNally and Co, 1967.
Silverman, David. Interpreting Qualitative Data. Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction, London: Sage, 2001.
Strobel, Johannes, and Angela van Barneveld. “When is PBL more effective? A meta-synthesis of meta analyses comparing PBL to conventional classrooms.” The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem based Learning 3, 1(2009): 44-58.
Trigwell, Keith, Michael Prosser, and Philip Taylor, “Qualitative differences in approaches to teaching first year university science.” Higher Education 27 (1994): 75-84.
Villa Sanchez, Aurelio, and Manuel Poblete Ruiz, eds. Competence-based learning.
Tuning Project. Bilbao: University of Deusto, 2008.
Voorhees, Richard A. “Competency-Based Learning Models: A Necessary Future.” New directions for institutional research 110 (2001): 5-13.
Wenger, Etienne, Richard Arnold McDermott, and William Snyder. Cultivating communities of practice. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2002.
Yorke, Mantz. “Formative assessment in higher education: moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice.” Higher Education 45, 4 (2003): 477-501.
Authors are required to sign and submit a copyright transfer agreement after acceptance but before publication of their manuscript. To that effect, they receive, from the Managing Editor of Tuning Journal for Higher Education, a standard copyright assignment form designed along the following lines:
The author who signs the copyright transfer agreement must be the sole creator of the work or legally acting on behalf of and with the full agreement of all the contributing authors.
2. Copyright and Code of conduct:
a) Authors warrant that their work is original; has not been previously copyrighted or published in any form; is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; its submission and publication do not violate TJHE Ethical Guidelines for Publication and any codes (of conduct), privacy and confidentiality agreements, laws or any rights of any third party; and no publication payment by the Publisher (University of Deusto) is required.
b) Authors are solely liable for the consequences that may arise from third parties’ complaints about the submitted manuscript and its publication in Tuning Journal for Higher Education (TJHE).
c) Authors grant to the Publisher the worldwide, sub-licensable, and royalty-free right to exploit the work in all forms and media of expression, now known or developed in the future, for educational and scholarly purposes.
d) Authors retain the right to archive, present, display, distribute, develop, and republish their work (publisher's version) to progress their scientific career provided the original publication source (Tuning Journal) is acknowledged properly and in a way that does not suggest the Publisher endorses them or their use of the wortk.
e) Authors warrant that no permissions or licences of any kind will be granted that might infringe the rights granted to the Publisher.
Tuning Journal for Higher Education is an Open Access publication. Its content is free for full and immediate access, reading, search, download, distribution and reuse in any medium or format only for non-commercial purposes and in compliance with any applicable copyright legislation, without prior permission from the Publisher or the author(s). In any case, proper acknowledgement of the original publication source must be made and any changes to the original work must be indicated clearly and in a manner that does not suggest the author’s and or Publisher’s endorsement whatsoever. Any other use of its content in any medium or format, now known or developed in the future, requires prior written permission of the copyright holder.