Utah Tuning Project

Randall S. Davies, David Williams

Abstract


Tuning is a faculty-driven initiative designed to improve the quality of higher education by establishing transparent and fully assessable learning outcomes and proficiencies for degrees, discipline by discipline. Unlike many other initiatives in the United States which function within an individual institution, the Utah Tuning Project involved all institutes of higher education within the state of Utah. The purpose of this paper is to document the findings from an evaluation of a multiyear project targeting four undergraduate degree programs involved in a tuning initiative. A summary of recommendations and best practices is provided, along with the challenges and benefits to individuals and programs engaged in this process.


Keywords


Tuning; learning outcomes; higher education; degree specifications; program development; program evaluation

References


Arum, Richard, and Josipa Roksa. Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2011.

Carnevale, Anthony P. “The Real Education Crisis Is Just over That Cliff.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, 2012, 1–5. http://chronicle.com/article/The-Real-Education-Crisis-Is/132167.

Common Core State Standards Initiative. About the Standards, 2011. http://www.corestandards.org/about-the-standards.

Educational Testing Services. Student Learning Outcomes in Higher Education, n.d. http://www.ets.org/education_topics/learning_outcomes.

Fischer, Karin. “Crisis of Cinfidence Threatens Colleges.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, 2010. http://chronicle.com/article/A-Crisis-of-Confidence/127530.

Hacker, Andrew, and Claudia Dreifus. Higher Education?: How Colleges Are Wasting Our Money and Failing Our Kids - and What We Can Do About It. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Griffin., 2010.

Legislative Analyst’s Office. Education Mandates: Overhauling a Broken System, 2010. http://www.lao.ca.gov/reports/2010/edu/educ_mandates/ed_mandates_020210.aspx.

Millett, Catherine M., David G. Payne, Carol A. Dwyer, Leslie M. Stickler, and Jon J. Alexiou. “A Culture of Evidence: An Evidence-Centered Approach to Accountability for Student Learning Outcomes.” Learning, 2008. http://www.ets.org/education_topics/learning_outcomes.

Patton, Michael Quinn. Developmental Evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. New York NY: The Guilford Press, 2011.

Petrides, Lisa A., Sara I. McClelland, and Thad R. Nodine. “Using External Accountability Mandates to Create Internal Change. Planning for Higher Education.” Planning for Higher Education 33, no. 1 (2004): 44–50.

Turley, Steve. “Professional Lives of Teacher Educators in an Era of Mandated Reform.” Teacher Education Quarterly 32, no. 4 (2005): 37–59.

Weiner, Wendy F. “Establishing a Culture of Assessment: Fifteen Elements of Assessment Success—how Many Does Your Campus Have?” Academe 32, no. 9 (2009): 37–59.

West, Martin R., and Paul E. Peterson. “The Politics and Practice of Accountability.” In No Child Left behind? The Politics and Practice of School Accountability, edited by Martin R. West and Paul E. Peterson, 1–20. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2003.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18543/tjhe-2(2)-2015pp235-251

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.