Is the role of academics as teachers changing? An exploratory analysis in Italian universities
Abstract
University teaching is under pressure to evolve in line with the social, cultural and economic changes of modern society. This process inevitably affects the professional profile of academics since it creates an increasing tension between the traditional modes of teaching and the learning styles and professional expectations of students. This article analyses, both theoretically and empirically, the process of change of university teachers in the face of today’s challenges. The empirical analysis is based on the Italian university system, which has always been characterised by an overall reluctance to reforms. This article presents a theoretical framework based on two dimensions, i.e., the teacher/university relationship and the teacher/student relationship, to investigate the evolution of the professional profile of academics as teachers on the basis of seven teaching practices identified in the literature. The findings show that, besides some limits that are specific to professional bureaucracies, the support of universities is fundamental to promote innovation in teachers’ teaching practices, which are otherwise regulated and shaped only by their disciplinary community.
Received: 14 January 2019
Accepted: 27 March 2019
Published online: 29 May 2019
Downloads
References
Agasisti, Tommaso, Giovanni Barbato, Martina Dal Molin, and Matteo Turri. “Internal quality assurance in universities: does NPM matter?” Studies in Higher Education (November 2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1405252.
Agenzia Nazionale di Valutazione del Sistema Universitario e della Ricerca (ANVUR). “Rapporto sullo Stato del Sistema Universitario e della Ricerca 2016.” 2016. http://www.anvur.it/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/ANVUR_Rapporto_INTEGRALE_~pdf. [In Italian]
Astin, Alexander W. “Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education.” Journal of College Student Personnel 25 (1984): 297-308.
Bager-Elsborg, Anna. “How lecturers’ understanding of change is embedded in disciplinary practices: a multiple case study.” Higher Education 76, no. 2 (August 2018): 195-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0195-0.
Becher, Tony, and Paul R. Trowler. Academic tribes and territories. 2nd ed. Buckingham: Open University Press, 2001.
Biggs, John, and Catherine Tang. Teaching for quality learning at university. 4th ed. Maidenhead: McGraw Hill Education, 2011.
Billing, David. “Teaching for transfer of core/key skills in higher education: Cognitive skills.” Higher Education 53, no. 4(2007): 483-516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-005-5628-5.
Blau, Peter M. The organization of academic work. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1973.
Boffo, Stefano, and Roberto Moscati. “Evaluation in Italian higher education system. Many tribes, many territories, many…godfathers.” European Journal of Education 33, no. 3 (1998): 349-360.
Boffo, Stefano, Roberto Moscati, and Massimiliano Vaira. “The Academic Workplace. Country Report Italy.” In The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe. Edited by Jürgen Enders and Egbert de Weert, 243-263. Frankfurt am Main: Gewerkschaft Erziehung und Wissenschaft, 2004.
Capano, Giliberto. “Government continues to do its job: a comparative study of governance shifts in the higher education sector.” Public Administration 89, no. 4 (December, 2011): 1622-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01936.x.
Capano, Giliberto, Marino Regini, and Matteo Turri. Changing governance in universities. Italian higher education in comparative perspective. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.
Cardoso, Sónia, Maria J. Rosa and Bjørn Stensaker. “Why is quality in higher education not achieved? The view of academics.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41, no. 6 (2016): 950–65.
Choi, Bo Keum, and Byung Shik Rhee. “The influences of student engagement, institutional mission, and cooperative learning climate on the generic competency development of Korean undergraduate students.” Higher Education 67, no. 1 (2014): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9637-5.
Clark, Burton R. Academic power in Italy. Bureaucracy and oligarchy in a national university system. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1977.
Clark, Burton R. The higher education system. Academic organization in cross-national perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.
Coggi, Cristina, and Paola Ricchiardi. “Developing effective teaching in higher education.” Form@re - Open Journal Per La Formazione In Rete 18 (2018): 23-38. https://doi.org/10.13128/formare-22452.
Devlin, Marcia, and Gayani Samarawickrema, “The criteria of effective teaching in a changing higher education context.” Higher Education Research and Development 29, no. 2 (2010): 111-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360903244398.
Dill, David D., and Maarja Soo. “Academic quality, league tables, and public policy: A cross-national analysis of university ranking systems.” Higher Education 49, no. 4 (2005): 495-533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-1746-8.
Dirkx, John, and Anna Serbati. “Promoting faculty professional development: strategies for individual and collective reflection towards institutional change.” In Preparare alla professionalità docente e innovare la didattica universitaria, edited by Ettore Felisatti and Anna Serbati, 21-28. Milano: Franco Angeli, 2017.
Enders, Jurgen. Academic Staff in Europe. Changing Contexts and Conditions. London: Greewood Press, 2001.
European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ENQA). “European Standards and Guidelines (ESG) 2015.” https://enqa.eu/index.php/home/esg/. [In English]
Esdar, Wiebke, Julia Gorges, and Elke Wild. “The role of basic need satisfaction for junior academics’ goal conflicts and teaching motivation.” Higher Education 72, no. 2 (2016): 175-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9944-0.
Entwistle, Noel. Teaching for understanding at university. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2009.
Fanghanel, Joëlle, and Paul Trowler. “Exploring Academic Identities and Practices in a Competitive Enhancement Context: a UK-based case study.” European Journal of Education 43, no. 3 (2008): 301-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2008.00356.x.
Fondazione Giovanni Agnelli (FGA). La didattica in università: una ricerca nelle differenti discipline – Analisi delle modalità didattiche, degli strumenti per la verifica degli apprendimenti e dello studio individuale. 2016. Slidebook_AIE_FGA http://www.fondazioneagnelli.it/2016/09/29/la-didattica-alluniversita/. [In Italian]
Ettore, Felisatti, and Anna Serbati. Preparare alla professionalità docente e innovare la didattica universitaria. Milano: Franco Angeli, 2017.
Goode, William J. “The Theoretical Limits of Professionalization.” In The Semi- Professions and their Organization, edited by Amitai Etzioni, 266-313. New York: The Free Press, 1969.
Harvey, Lee and Jethro Newton. “Transforming quality evaluation.” Quality in Higher Education 10, no. 2 (2004): 149-65, https://doi.org/10.1080/1353832042000230635.
Harvey, Lee and Jethro Newton. “Transforming Quality Evaluation: Moving On.” In Quality Assurance In Higher Education, edited by Don F. Westerheijden, Bjør Stensaker and Maria J Rosa, Higher Education Dynamics vol 20. Dordrecht: Springer, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6012-0_9.
Henkel, Mary. Academic identities and policy change in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley Publisher, 2000.
Hoehle, Ester Ava, and Ulrich Teichler. “The Teaching Function of the Academic Profession.” In The Work Situation of the Academic Profession in Europe: Findings of a Survey in Twelve Countries, edited by Ulrich Teichler and Ester Ava Hoehle, 79-108. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013.
Horta, Hugo, Vincent Dautel, and Francisco M. Veloso. “An output perspective on the teaching–research nexus. An analysis focusing on the United States higher education system.” Studies in Higher Education 37, no. 2 (2012): 171-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.503268.
Hughes, Everett C. Men and Their Work. New York: The Free Press, 1958.
Kaynardağ, Aynur Yürekli. “Pedagogy in HE: does it matter?” Studies in Higher Education 44, no. 1 (2019): 111-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1340444.
Krause, Elliott A. “Les guildes, l’Etat et la progression du capitalisme. Les professions savantes des 1930 à nos jours.” Sociologie et Sociétés 20, no. 2 (1988): 91-124. https://doi.org/10.7202/001391ar.
Larson-Sarfatti, Magali. The rise of professionalism: A sociological analysis. Berkeley: The University of California Press, 1977.
Leiber, Theodor, Bjørn Stensaker, and Lee Harvey. “Impact evaluation of quality assurance in higher education: methodology and causal designs.” Quality in Higher Education 21, no3(2015): 288-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2015.1111007.
Light, Donald Jr. “The structure of the academic professions.” Sociology of Education 47, no. 1 (1974): 2-28. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112165.
Louvel, Séverine. “Understanding change in higher education as bricolage: how academics engage in curriculum change.” Higher Education 66, no. 6 (2013): 669-691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9628-6.
Mintzberg, Henry. The structuring of organizations: A synthesis of research. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1979.
Moscati, Roberto. (Ed.). Chi governa l’università? Il mondo accademico italiano tra conservazione e mutamento. Napoli: Liguori, 1997.
Moscati, Roberto, ed. Come e perché cambiano le università in Italia e in Europa. Napoli: Liguori, 2010.
Musselin, Christine. “Redefinition of the relationships between academics and their university.” Higher Education 65, no. 1 (2013): 25-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9579-3.
Neave, Guy, and Gary Rhoades. “The Academic Estate in Western Europe.” In The Academic Profession. National, Disciplinary and Institutional Settings, edited by Burton R. Clark. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987.
Neuman, Ruth, Sharon Parry, and Tony Becher. “Teaching and learning in their disciplinary contexts. A conceptual analysis.” Studies in Higher Education 27, no. 4 (2002): 405-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507022000011525.
Nigris, Elisabetta. “Learning to teach: the pilot programme to improve faculty members teaching skills at the University of Milano-Bicocca.” Form@are – Open Journal Per la Formazione in Rete 18, no. 1 (2018): 53-66. https://doi.org/10.13128/formare-22603.
Nowotny, Helga. The cunning of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2016.
Piper, David Warren. “Are Professors Professionals?” In The Organization of University Examination, edited by David Warren Piper, 1-18. London: J. Kingsley, 1994.
Polanyi, Michael. “The republic of science. Its political and economic theory.” Minerva 38, no. 1 (1962): 54-73.
Rostan, Michele, ed. La professione accademica in Italia. Aspetti, problemi e confronti nel contesto Europeo. Milano: LED, 2011.
Saroyan, Alenoush, and Cheryl Amundsen. “Evaluating university teaching. Time to take stock.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 26, no. 4 (2001): 341-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930120063493.
Saroyan, Alenoush, and Keith Trigwell. “Higher education teachers’ professional learning. Process and outcome.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 46 (2015): 92-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.03.008.
Suleman, Fátima. “The employability skills of higher education graduates: insights into conceptual frameworks and methodological options.” Higher Education 76, no. 2 (2018): 263-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0207-0.
Silander, Charlotte, and Martin Stigmar. “Individual growth or institutional development? Ideological perspectives on motives behind Swedish higher education teacher training.” Higher Education 77, no. 2 (2019): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0272-z.
Shinn, Larry D. “Liberal education in the age of the unthinkable.” Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 44 (2012): 15-21. http://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2012.691858.
Teichler, Ulrich. “Changing perspectives. The professional relevance of higher education on the way towards the highly-educated society.” European Journal of Education 50, no. 4 (2015): 461-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12146.
Teichler, Ulrich, Akira Arimoto and William K. Cummings. The changing academic profession. Major findings of a comparative survey. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013.
Turri, Matteo. “The new Italian agency for the evaluation of the university system (ANVUR): a need for governance or legitimacy?” Quality in Higher education 20, no. 1 (2014): 64-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2014.889429.
Wilensky, Harold L. “The professionalization of everyone?” American Journal of Sociology 70, no. 2 (1964): 137-58.
Yin, Robert K. Case study research, design and methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1994.
Zheng, Lanqin, Xin Li, and Fengying Chen. “Effects of a mobile self-regulated learning approach on students’ learning achievements and self-regulated learning skills.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 55, no. 6 (2018): 616-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1259080.
Authors are required to sign and submit a copyright transfer agreement after acceptance but before publication of their manuscript. To that effect, they receive, from the Managing Editor of Tuning Journal for Higher Education, a standard copyright assignment form designed along the following lines:
1. Authorship:
The author who signs the copyright transfer agreement must be the sole creator of the work or legally acting on behalf of and with the full agreement of all the contributing authors.
2. Copyright and Code of conduct:
a) Authors warrant that their work is original; has not been previously copyrighted or published in any form; is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; its submission and publication do not violate TJHE Ethical Guidelines for Publication and any codes (of conduct), privacy and confidentiality agreements, laws or any rights of any third party; and no publication payment by the Publisher (University of Deusto) is required.
b) Authors are solely liable for the consequences that may arise from third parties’ complaints about the submitted manuscript and its publication in Tuning Journal for Higher Education (TJHE).
c) Authors grant to the Publisher the worldwide, sub-licensable, and royalty-free right to exploit the work in all forms and media of expression, now known or developed in the future, for educational and scholarly purposes.
d) Authors retain the right to archive, present, display, distribute, develop, and republish their work (publisher's version) to progress their scientific career provided the original publication source (Tuning Journal) is acknowledged properly and in a way that does not suggest the Publisher endorses them or their use of the wortk.
e) Authors warrant that no permissions or licences of any kind will be granted that might infringe the rights granted to the Publisher.
3. Users:
Tuning Journal for Higher Education is an Open Access publication. Its content is free for full and immediate access, reading, search, download, distribution and reuse in any medium or format only for non-commercial purposes and in compliance with any applicable copyright legislation, without prior permission from the Publisher or the author(s). In any case, proper acknowledgement of the original publication source must be made and any changes to the original work must be indicated clearly and in a manner that does not suggest the author’s and or Publisher’s endorsement whatsoever. Any other use of its content in any medium or format, now known or developed in the future, requires prior written permission of the copyright holder.
1.jpg)
1.jpg)
.jpg)
1.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
