Improving Basic Design courses through Competences of Tuning MEDA

Rafee Hakky

Abstract


It is well established that Tuning’s development of the concept of competences for the improvement of what is referred to as student-centered approach has proven itself beneficial in developing higher education programs.[1]  This paper examines the application of competences suggested by Tuning-MEDA to the benefit of teaching architecture. Two courses were selected from the Architectural Engineering Program at the International University for Science and Technology, Damascus, Syria; namely, Basic Design I and II. Five competences were selected as crucial to be achieved in these two courses: ability to think, perceive and conceive spaces three dimensionally and communicate verbally, in writing, graphically, and/or volumetrically; have critical thinking, analysis and synthesis; knowledge of aesthetics and arts, and understanding their role as key factors in the quality of architectural thinking and design; possess a high level of interpersonal skills; and appreciation of the social and cultural role of architecture. The two courses are evaluated at two levels before being examined in relation to their ability to achieve these competences. They were looked at in connection with Bloom’s Taxonomy and found to be able to deliver learning at its upper levels; namely, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. They were also examined against the typical Learning Retention Pyramid and were found to provide learning opportunities through learning techniques which provide a high level of retention: demonstration, group discussion, and practice by doing. Finally, it was found that the five competences assigned to the courses were very much achievable and indeed through applying them, the two courses were more focused and could achieve their objectives more successfully.


[1] Robert Wagenaar, “Competences and learning Outcomes: a Panacea for Understanding the (New) Role of Higher Education?” Tuning Journal for Higher Education 1, no. 2 (May 2014): 279-302.


Keywords


architectural education; basic design; competences; design courses; design education; architectural design

Full Text:

[PDF] [HTML]

References


Augusti, Giuliano. “Transnational Recognition and Accreditation of Engineering Educational Programmes in Europe: Perspectives in a Global Framework.” European Journal of Engineering Education 31, no. 3 (2006): 249-260.

Baker, Thomas, and Howard Smith Jr. “Integrating Accreditation into Strategic Planning.” Community College Journal of Research and Practice 60, no. 3 (February 2007): 21-27.

Bedny, Alexander, Liliya Erushkina, and Oleg Kuzendov. “Modernising Education Programmes in ICT Based on the Tuning Methodology.” Tuning Journal for Higher Education 1, no. 2 (May 2014): 387-404.

Beneitone, Pablo, and Edurne Bartolomé. “Global Generic Competences with Local Ownership: a Comparative Study from the Perspective of graduates in Four World Regions.” Tuning Journal for Higher Education 1, no. 2 (May 2014): 303-334.

Cerqueira, Marcos., A Literature Review on the Benefits, Challenges and Trends in Accreditation as a Quality Assurance System, p. 7.

Gelernter, Mark. “Reconciling Lectures and Studios.” Journal of Architectural Education 41, no. 2 (1988): 46.

Girot, Elizabeth. “Assessment of Competence in Clinical Practice — A Review of the Literature.” Nurse Education Today 13, no. 2 (April 1993): 83-90.

Gonzalez, Julia, and Maria Yarosh, “Building Degree Profiles. The Tuning Approach,” Tuning Journal for Higher Education 1, no. 1, (Nov. 2013): 37-69.

Groat, Linda, and Sherry B. Ahrentzen. “Voices for Change in Architectural Education: Seven Facets of Transformation from the Perspectives of Faculty Women.” Journal of Architectural Education 50, no. 4 (1997): 271-285.

Hahn, Karola, and Damtew Teferra. “Tuning as Instrument of Systematic Higher Education reform and Quality Enhancement: The African Experience.” Tuning Journal for Higher Education 1, no. 1 (November 2013): 127-163.

http://thesecondprinciple.com/teaching-essentials/beyond-bloom-cognitivetaxonomy-revised/ (Retrieved 10/4/2016).

http://www.westmuse.org/sites/westmuse.org/files/uploads/2012/03/pyramid.png (Retrieved 16/4/2016).

Mazumdar, Sanjoy. “Cultural Values in Architectural Education: An Example from India.” Journal of Architectural Education 46, no. 4, (1993): 230-238.

Nicklin, Wendy, The Value and Impact of Health Care Accreditation. Accreditation Canada, 2008, pp. 2-4.

Patil, Arun, and Gary Codner. “Accreditation of Engineering Education: Review, Observations and Proposal for Global Accreditation.” European Journal of Engineering Education 32, no. 6 (2007): 639-651.

Serbati, Anna, and Alessio Surian. “Developing Reflection on Competence-Based Learning: the Russian Experience with the Tuning Approach.” Tuning Journal for Higher Education 1, no. 2 (May 2014): 463-481.

Sid Nair, Chenicheri, Arun Patil, Patricie Metrova. “Re-engineering graduate skills — a case study.” European Journal of Engineering Education 34, no. 2 (2009): 131-139.

Tuning for the Middle East and North Africa: Architecture. Fourth Report, University of Deusto, 16, 3, 2016.

Wagenaar, Robert. “Columbus Egg? Qualifications Frameworks, Sectoral Profiles and Degree Programme Profiles in Higher Education,” Tuning Journal for Higher Education 1, no. 1 (November 2013): 71-103.

_____. “Competences and learning Outcomes: a Panacea for Understanding the (New) Role of Higher Education?” Tuning Journal for Higher Education 1, no. 2 (May 2014): 279-302.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18543/tjhe-4(1)-2016pp21-42

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.